|
NO GENOCIDE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUESTION 6:
DID THE TURKS UNDERTAKE A PLANNED AND
SYSTEMATIC MASSACRE OF THE ARMENIANS
IN 1915 ?
The beginning of World War I and the Ottoman
entry into the war on November 1, 1914
on the side of Germany and Austria -
Hungary against the Entente powers was
considered as a
great opportunity by the Armenian
nationalists. Louise Nalbandian relates that
"The Armenian
revolutionary committees considered that the
most opportune time to begin a general
uprising to achieve their goals was
when the Ottoman Empire was in a
state of war",24 and thus less able to
resist an internal attack.
Even before the war began, in August 1914,
the Ottoman leaders met with the Dashnaks
at Erzurum in the hope of getting
them to support the Ottoman war effort when
it came. The
Dashnaks promised that if the Ottomans
entered the war, they would do their duty as
loyal countrymen
in the Ottoman armies. However they failed
to live up to this promise, since even
before this meeting took place, a
secret Dashnak Congress held at Erzurum in
June 1914 had
already decided to use the oncoming war to
undertake a general attack against the
Ottoman state.25
The Russian Armenians joined the Russian
army in preparing an attack on the Ottomans
as soon as war was declared. The
Catholicos of Echmiadzin assured the Russian
GeneralGovernor of the Caucasus,
Vranzof-Dashkof, that "in return for
Russia's forcing the Ottomans to make
reforms for the Armenians, all the
Russian Armenians would support the Russian
war effort without conditions.". The
Catholicos subsequently was received at
Tiflis by the Czar, whom he told that "The
liberation of the Armenians in
Anatolia would lead to the establishment of
an autonomous Armenia separated from
Turkish suzerainty and that this
Armenia could be made possible with the
protection of Russia.” Of course the
Russians really intended to use the
Armenians to annex Eastern Anatolia, but the
Catholicos was
told nothing about that.
As soon as Russia declared war on the
Ottoman Empire, the Dashnak Society's
official organ
Horizon declared:
"The Armenians have taken their place on the
side of the Entente states without showing
any hesitation
whatsoever; they have placed all their
forces at the disposition of Russia; and
they also are forming volunteer
battalions. "
The Dashnak Committee also ordered
its cells that had been preparing to revolt
within the Ottoman Empire:
"As soon as the Russians have crossed
the borders and the Ottoman armies have
started to retreat, you
should revolt everywhere. The Ottoman
armies thus will be placed between two
fires; if the Ottoman armies advance
against the Russians, on the other
hand, their Armenian soldiers should leave
their units with their weapons, form
bandit forces, and unite with the
Russians." The
Hunchak Committee instructions to its
organizations in the Ottoman territory were:
"The Hunchak Committee will use all means to
assist the Entente states, devoting all its
forces to the
struggle to assure victory in Armenia,
Cilicia, the Caucasus and Azerbaijan as the
ally of the Entente states, and in
particular of Russia."'
And even the Armenian representative in the
Ottoman Parliament for Van, Papazyan,
soon turned out to be a leading
guerilla fighter against the Ottomans,
publishing a proclamation
that: "The
volunteer Armenian regiments in the Caucasus
should prepare themselves for battle, serve
as advance units
for the Russian armies to help them capture
the key positions in the districts where the
Armenians live, and
advance into Anatolia, joining the
Armenian units already there.''
As the Russian forces advanced into
Ottoman territory in eastern Anatolia, they
were led by
advance units composed of volunteer Ottoman
and Russian Armenians, who were joined by
the Armenians who deserted the Ottoman
armies and went over to the Russians. Many
of these also
formed bandit forces with weapons and
ammunition which they had for years been
stocking in
Armenian and missionary churches and
schools, going on to raid Ottoman supply
depots both to
increase their own arms and to deny them to
the Ottoman army as it moved to meet this
massive Russian invasion. Within a
few months after the war began, these
Armenian guerilla
forces, operating in close coordination with
the Russians, were savagely attacking
Turkish cities,
towns and villages in the East; massacring
their inhabitants without mercy, while at
the same time
working to sabotage the Ottoman army's war
effort by destroying roads and bridges,
raiding caravans,
and doing whatever else they could to ease
the Russian occupation. The atrocities
committed by the Armenian volunteer
forces accompanying the Russian army were so
severe that the
Russian commanders themselves felt compelled
to withdraw them sometimes from the
fighting fronts and send them to rear
guard duties. The memoirs of all too many
Russian officers
who served in the East at this time are
filled with accounts of the revolting
atrocities committed
by these Armenian guerillas, who were
savage even by the relatively primitive
standards of war
then observed in such areas.
Nor did these Armenian atrocities affect
only Turks and other Muslims. The Armenian
guerillas had never been happy with
the failure of the Greeks and Jews to fully
support their
revolutionary programs. As a result in
Trabzon and vicinity they massacred
thousands of Greeks,
while in the area of Hakkari it was
the Jews who were rounded up and massacred
by the Armenian guerillas. Basically the aim
of these atrocities was to leave only
Armenians in the
territories being claimed for the new
Armenian state; all others therefore were
massacred or
forced to flee for their lives so as to
secure the desired Armenian majority of the
population in
preparation for the peace settlement.
Leading the first Armenian units who
crossed the Ottoman border in the company of
the Russian
invaders was the former Ottoman
Parliamentary representative for Erzurum,
Karekin
Pastirmaciyan, who now assumed the
revolutionary name Armen Garo. Another
former Ottoman
parliamentarian, Hamparsum Boyaciyan, led
the Armenian guerilla forces who ravaged
Turkish villages behind the lines
under the nickname "Murad", specifically
ordering that "Turkish
children also should be killed as
they form a danger to the Armenian nation."
Another former Member of
Parliament, Papazyan, led the
Armenian guerilla forces that ravaged the
areas of Van, Bitlis and
Mush.
In March 1915 the Russian forces began to
move toward Van. Immediately, on April 11,
1915 the Armenians of Van began a
general revolt, massacring all the Turks in
the vicinity so as to
make possible its quick and easy
conquest by the Russians. Little wonder that
Czar Nicholas II
sent a telegram of thanks to the Armenian
Revolutionary Committee of Van on April 21,
1915, "thanking it
for its services to Russia." The Armenian
newspaper Gochnak, published in the United
States, also proudly reported on May
24, 1915 that "only, 1,500 Turks remain in
Van", the rest
having been slaughtered.
The Dashnak representative told the
Armenian National Congress assembled at
Tiflis in February
1915 that "Russia provided 242,000 rubles
before the war even began to arm and prepare
the Ottoman
Armenians to undertake revolts", giving some
idea of how the Russian-Armenian alliance
had long prepared
to undermine the Ottoman war effort.34 Under
these circumstances, with the
Russians advancing along a wide front
in the East, with the Armenian guerillas
spreading death
and destruction while at the same time
attacking the Ottoman armies from the rear,
with the Allies
also fighting with the Empire along a wide
front from Galicia to Iraq, from Gallipoli
to Egypt and
Syria, the Ottoman decision to relocate the
Armenians from the war zones was a
moderate and entirely legitimate
measure of self-defense.
Even after the revolt and massacres
at Van, the Ottoman
government made one final
effort to secure general Armenian
support for the war effort, summoning the
Patriarch, some
Armenian Members of Parliament, and other
delegates to a meeting where they were
warned that
drastic measures would be taken unless
Armenians stopped slaughtering Muslims and
working to
undermine the war effort. When there was no
evident lessening of the Armenian attacks,
the government
finally acted. On April 24, 1915 the
Armenian revolutionary committees were
closed and 235 of
their leaders were arrested for activities
against the state. It is the date of these
arrests that in
recent years has been annually commemorated
by Armenian nationalist groups throughout
the world in commemoration of the
"massacre" that they claim took place at
this time. No such massacre, however, took
place, at this or any other time during the
war: In the face of the great
dangers which the Empire faced at
that time, great care was taken to make
certain that the
Armenians were treated carefully and
compassionately as they were relocated
within the Empire,
generally to Syria and Palestine when they
came from southern Anatolia, and to Iraq if
they came from the
north. The Ottoman Council of Ministers thus
ordered: "When
those of the Armenians resident in the
aforementioned towns and villages who
have to be moved are
transferred to their places of
settlement and are on the road, their
comfort must be assured and their lives and
property
protected; after their arrival their food
should be paid for out of Refugees'
Appropriations until they are definitively
settled in their new homes. Property
and land should be distributed to them in
accordance with their previous financial
situation as well as their current
needs; and for those among them needing
further help, the government should build
houses, provide cultivators and
artisans with seed, tools, and equipment."
And it went on to specify:
"This order is entirely intended
against the extension of the Armenian
Revolutionary Committees; therefore
do not execute it in such a manner
that might cause the mutual massacre of
Muslims and Armenians."
"Make arrangements for special
officials to accompany the groups of
Armenians who are being relocated,
and make sure they are provided with
food and other needed things, paying the
cost out of the allotments set aside for
emigrants. "
"The food needed by the emigrants while
travelling until they reach their
destinations must be provided ... for
poor emigrants by credit for the
installation of the
emigrants. The camps provided for
transported persons
should be kept under regular
supervision; necessary steps for their well
being should be taken, and order and
security assured. Make certain that indigent
emigrants are given enough food and that
their health is assured
by daily visits by a doctor... Sick
people, poor people, women and children
should be sent by rail, and others
on mules, in carts or on foot
according to their power of endurance. Each
convoy should be accompanied by a
detachment of guards, and the food supply
for each convoy should be guarded until the
destination is
reached... In cases where the emigrants are
attacked, either in the camps or during the
journeys, all efforts
should be taken to repel the attacks
immediately...”
Out of the some 700,000 Armenians who were
transported in this way until early 1916,
certainly some lives were lost, as
the result both of large scale military and
bandit activities then
going on in the areas through which
they passed, as well as the general
insecurity and blood feuds
which some tribal forces sought to
carry out as the
caravans passed through their territories.
In addition, the
relocation and settlement of the relocated
Armenians took place at a time when the
Empire was suffering from severe
shortages of fuel, food, medicine and other
supplies as well as
large-scale plague and famine. It
should not be forgotten that, at the same
time, an entire Ottoman
army of 90,000 men was lost in the
East as a result of severe shortages, or
that through the
remainder of the war as many as three to
four million Ottoman subjects of all
religions died as a
result of the same conditions that
afflicted the relocatees. How tragic and
unfeeling it is, therefore,
for Armenian nationalists to blame
the undoubted suffering of the Armenians
during the war to something more than the
same anarchical conditions which afflicted
all the Sultan's subjects. This
is the truth behind the false claims
distorting historical facts by ill-devised
mottoes such as the
"first genocide of the Twentieth
Century". After
the World War I, the Armenian allegations
were investigated between 1919 and
1922 as part of a legal process
against the Ottoman officials. The Peace
Treaty of Sevres, which
was imposed upon the defeated Ottoman
Empire, required the Ottoman government to
hand over to the
Allied Powers the persons accused of
“massacres”. Subsequently, 144 high Ottoman
officials were arrested and deported
for trial by Britain to the island of Malta.
The information
which led to the arrests was mainly given by
local Armenians and the Armenian
Patriarchate. So
while the deportees were interned on Malta
the British occupation forces in Istanbul
which had absolute
power and authority in Ottoman capital,
looked frantically everywhere to find
evidence in order
to incriminate the deportees.
An Armenian scholar, Haig Kahzarlan,
appointed by the British, conducted thorough
examination of documentary evidence
in the Ottoman and British archives.
However, Khazarian
could not find any evidence demonstrating
that the Ottoman government and the Ottoman
officials deported to Malta either
sanctioned or encouraged the killings of the
Armenians.
Thereupon, the British Foreign Office
thought that the American government would
doubtlessly be in possession of a
large amount of documentary evidence
compiled at the time of
the “massacres”. Indeed, if alleged
massacres took place in 1915-1917, the
Americans must have
been in possession of a mass of material,
since at that time American diplomatic and
consular officials
were freely performing their duties in
Turkey. Furthermore, the American Near East
Relief Society, ubiquitous
institution of missionaries, was allowed by
the Ottoman government to
fulfill its relief functions in
Anatolia during the relocation. Therefore,
they should have witnessed
crimes and accumulated a lot of
evidence against the Ottoman officials.
So, in desperation the British
Foreign Office turned to the American
archives in
Washington. On March 31, 1921, Lord Curzon
telegraphed to Sir A.Geddes, the British
Ambassador in Washington the
following.
“The are in the hands of His Majesty’s
Government a Malta a number of Turks
arrested for alleged complicity in
the Armenian massacres. There are
considerable
difficulties in establishing the proofs of
guilt… Please ascertain if the
United States are in possession of
any evidence that would be of value for
purposes of prosecution.”
On July 13, 1921, the British Embassy
in Washington returned the following reply:
“I have the honour to inform Your Lordship
that a member of my staff visited the… State
Department… He was
permitted to see a selection of reports from
United States Consuls on the subject of the
atrocities…
I regret to inform Your Lordship that there
was nothing therein which could be used as
evidence against the
Turks…”
At the conclusion of the investigation, no
evidence was found that could corroborate
the Armenian
claims. After two years and four months of
detention in Malta, all Ottoman deportees
were set free without trial. No
compensation was ever paid to the detainees.
BACK |
|
|
| | |